Write a literature review pdf
Outline of a Literature Review Introduction This section elucidates the focus and establishes the significance of the subject matter. The introduction and conclusion to your review of the literature should show how your research project will join the on-going conversation: identify the key terms and concepts and indicate how your research will resolve unresolved questions in others' work.
Literature review structure
Focus Your Topic Narrowly When writing your literature review, mull over the following: What interests you? The reasons for undertaking a literature review are numerous and include eliciting information for developing policies and evidence-based care, a step in the research process and as part of an academic assessment. Existing literature reviews and systematic reviews can also be important sources of data. Possible headings, adapted from appraisal tools for various types of literature are outlined in Table 3. Cimanuk No. It is different with traditional reviews that attempt to summarize results of a number of studies, systematic reviews use explicit and rigorous criteria to identify, critically evaluate and synthesize all the literature on a particular topic Cronin, et al, Sentences must flow logically and smoothly. Nurs Stand, 20 11 : 41—7. The above approaches on how to write a literature review will assist you to come up with the best review. Topics that are too broad will result in reviews that are either too long or too superficial. What duration of research will you contemplate? A systematic approach is considered most likely to generate a review that will be beneficial in informing practice Hek and Langton, ; Cronin et al, Because the objective of a review is to showcase that the writer is familiar with the crucial professional literature on the selected topic, check to ensure that all the significant, current, and pertinent texts have been covered.
A systematic approach is considered most likely to generate a review that will be beneficial in informing practice Hek and Langton, ; Cronin et al, Nurse Educ Pract 1: Colling, J Nasution No. Beecroft et.
Its goal is to bring the reader up-to-date with current literature on a topic and form the basis for another goal, such as the justification for future research in the area.
Knowledge in Society, 1: Conclusion It sums up the evidence presented and shows its importance. References Bocken, N. In order for your reader to move through your information with ease while keeping the big picture in view, order your body paragraphs in the same way that you did in the statement about how your literature review will proceed.
Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. However, for the individual undertaking a non-research based literature review this will be the first step.
Literature review in research methodology pdf
Furthermore, Hope , who cross-examined residents from different nursing homes, validate the claim that characteristics of the institutional environment like location are features that residents have mentioned as being important to their independence. Text ought to be composed in a clear and concise style. Sources n Sources, Sally, Examine and synthesize research findings and conclusions drawn. A systematic approach is considered most likely to generate a review that will be beneficial in informing practice Hek and Langton, ; Cronin et al, You will then present more specific information from the sources, using in-text citation, to discuss the abstractions in more detail and to point out areas of agreement or debate among sources. At this point, it may also be of benefit to undertake an initial classification and grouping of the articles by type of source Cronin, et al, Select an area of research which is due for a review. By conducting them, student or researchers can be involved in increasing the knowledge through evidence-based practice. Identify six to twelve studies that are closely related to the focus of your study and that you will use as the foundation for your proposed research.
Strive to eliminate or explain away articles that have faulty methods or that use faulty reasoning to support their findings.
based on 80 review